Quigley Down Under (1990)
Synopsis
"Quigley Down Under" (1990) is a Western film that follows the story of Matthew Quigley, an American sharpshooter played by Tom Selleck, who travels to Australia in the late 19th century. Quigley is lured by a lucrative job offer from a wealthy landowner, who seeks a skilled marksman to help him deal with the local Aboriginal population. Upon arrival, Quigley quickly discovers that the job is not what he expected, as he refuses to participate in the landowner's brutal plans against the indigenous people.
As tensions rise, Quigley finds himself at odds with the landowner and his henchmen, leading to a series of confrontations that test his skills and moral compass. With the help of a resourceful Aboriginal woman named Crazy Cora, Quigley embarks on a journey of survival and redemption. The film combines action, adventure, and a poignant commentary on colonialism, showcasing Quigley's transformation from a hired gun to a reluctant hero fighting for justice in a harsh and unforgiving landscape.
What is the budget of Quigley Down Under?
"Quigley Down Under," released in 1990, is a Western film that has captured the attention of audiences with its gripping narrative and strong performances. Directed by Simon Wincer, the film stars Tom Selleck as the titular character, Matthew Quigley, alongside Laura San Giacomo and Alan Rickman. The movie's budget plays a significant role in understanding its production and financial journey, making it an interesting case study for film enthusiasts and industry analysts alike.
What was the production budget of Quigley Down Under?
The production budget for "Quigley Down Under" was set at $20,000,000. This figure places it within a moderate range for films of its genre during the late 1980s and early 1990s. Compared to other Westerns of the time, such as "Dances with Wolves," which had a budget of around $22 million, "Quigley Down Under" was relatively economical.
Key Budget Allocation Categories
While specific breakdowns of budget allocation are not publicly available, typical costs for films like this often include:
- Talent: Salaries for lead actors and supporting cast.
- Locations: Expenses related to filming in Australia, including permits and logistics.
- Production Design: Costs for sets, costumes, and props that reflect the late 19th-century setting.
What were the major production costs?
Several factors contributed to the overall production costs of "Quigley Down Under."
- Location Filming: Shooting in Australia required significant investment in travel and accommodations.
- Stunt Coordination: The film features various action sequences that necessitated professional stunt work, adding to the budget.
- Costumes and Set Design: Authentic period costumes and detailed set designs were essential for creating the film's immersive environment.
Notable scenes, such as the climactic confrontations, likely incurred higher costs due to the complexity of the action and the need for safety measures.
How did Quigley Down Under perform at the box office?
"Quigley Down Under" grossed approximately $21,413,105 domestically. This figure indicates a modest box office performance, especially when compared to its production budget.
Domestic vs. International Breakdown
While specific international earnings are not detailed, the domestic box office performance suggests that the film did not achieve blockbuster status.
Break-even Point Analysis
To determine the break-even point, a film typically needs to earn about double its production budget to cover marketing and distribution costs. In this case, "Quigley Down Under" fell short of that target, indicating a financial struggle.
ROI Percentage
Calculating the return on investment (ROI) reveals that the film's earnings were not sufficient to classify it as a financial success. The ROI percentage would be negative, given the production costs versus box office returns.
Was Quigley Down Under profitable?
The financial outcome of "Quigley Down Under" suggests that it was not profitable. The film's box office earnings did not surpass its production budget, leading to a loss for the studio.
Impact on the Studio and Future Budgets
The underperformance of "Quigley Down Under" likely influenced the studio's approach to future projects, particularly in the Western genre. Studios may have become more cautious with budget allocations for similar films, focusing on projects with proven box office potential.
Records Set
While "Quigley Down Under" did not set any significant records, it remains a notable entry in the Western film category, particularly for its commentary on colonialism and its unique setting.
Commonly Asked Questions
How much did Quigley Down Under (1990) cost to make?
The production cost of "Quigley Down Under" was $20,000,000.
Was Quigley Down Under (1990) profitable?
No, the film did not achieve profitability, as its box office earnings were lower than its production budget.
What was the most expensive element of Quigley Down Under (1990)?
While specific details are not available, major costs likely stemmed from location filming and talent salaries.
How much did Quigley Down Under (1990) make at the box office?
The film grossed approximately $21,413,105 domestically.
Did Quigley Down Under (1990) go over budget?
There is no public information indicating that "Quigley Down Under" went over budget, but it did not meet its financial expectations at the box office.
In summary, "Quigley Down Under" serves as an intriguing case study in film budgeting and box office performance. Despite its engaging story and strong cast, the film's financial results highlight the challenges faced by Westerns in the early 1990s.
Budget Templates
Build your own production budget
Create professional budgets with industry-standard feature film templates. Real-time collaboration, no spreadsheets.
Start Budgeting Free
.png&w=1200&q=75)