"Chill Factor" is a thrilling action-comedy that follows the misadventures of two unlikely heroes, a fast-food worker named Tim and a former military operative named Leo. When a deadly chemical weapon is accidentally released in their small town, the duo finds themselves in a race against time to prevent a catastrophic disaster. With the help of a quirky scientist, they must navigate a series of comedic yet dangerous obstacles, all while trying to outsmart a group of mercenaries intent on retrieving the weapon for their own nefarious purposes. As the clock ticks down, Tim and Leo discover that friendship and courage can emerge from the most unexpected situations, leading to a showdown that will keep audiences on the edge of their seats.

What is the budget of Chill Factor?

"Chill Factor," an action released in 1999, was directed by Hugh Johnson and stars Cuba Gooding Jr., Skeet Ulrich. The production budget was $34,000,000, placing it in the mid-budget range for action productions of the 1990s.

Key Budget Allocation Categories

While specific budget breakdowns are not publicly available, typical cost drivers for an action production like this include:

Stunts, Action Sequences & Visual Effects: Action films allocate a substantial portion of their budget to choreographing and executing practical stunts, pyrotechnics, and CGI-heavy sequences.
Above-the-Line Talent (Cast & Director): A-list talent commands significant upfront fees plus backend participation.
Production Design, Sets & Locations: Action films frequently require multiple international shooting locations, large-scale set construction, vehicle acquisitions and modifications, and specialized equipment , all of which drive production costs well above those of dialogue-driven genres.
Production: Ulrich and Gooding were both cast in September 1998 and principal photography began on 5 October.

What were the major cost factors in Chill Factor?

Several factors contributed to the overall production costs of "Chill Factor."

Stunts: Stunts, Action Sequences & Visual Effects is one of the primary cost drivers in action productions of this scale.
Above-the-Line Talent (Cast: Above-the-Line Talent (Cast & Director) is one of the primary cost drivers in action productions of this scale.
Production Design: Production Design, Sets & Locations is one of the primary cost drivers in action productions of this scale.

How Does Chill Factor's Budget Compare to Similar Films?

At $34,000,000, Chill Factor sits in the mid-budget range. Here is how it compares to productions with a similar budget:

Baby Driver (2017): Budget $34,000,000, Worldwide Gross $226,945,087
1941 (1979): Budget $35,000,000, Worldwide Gross $94,900,000
Two for the Money (2005): Budget $35,000,000, Worldwide Gross $30,526,509
21 Bridges (2019): Budget $33,000,000, Worldwide Gross $49,900,000
Bridesmaids (2011): Budget $32,500,000, Worldwide Gross $288,383,523

The median budget for wide-release action films in the era ranges from $30 to 80M for mid-budget to $150M+ for tentpoles.

Chill Factor Box Office Performance

"Chill Factor" earned $11,263,966 worldwide at the box office. Against a production budget of $34,000,000, the film faced challenges in theatrical release. Home video, streaming, and ancillary revenue may have contributed to its overall performance.

A film typically needs to earn approximately twice its production budget to cover marketing and distribution costs. For "Chill Factor," that break-even threshold was roughly $68,000,000. With worldwide earnings of $11,263,966, the film did not reach break-even in theatrical release.

Production Budget: $34,000,000
Worldwide Gross: $11,263,966
Net Return: −$22,736,034
ROI: approximately -66.9%

At -66.9%, "Chill Factor" did not recoup its production budget through theatrical release alone.

Awards and Recognition

1 nomination total

Critical Reception

The film generally received negative reviews. On Rotten Tomatoes, it has an approval rating of 10% based on 79 reviews, with an average rating of 3.6/10. The site's consensus states: "Claiming it fails on every level, critics had almost nothing good to say about this movie." Metacritic reports a score of 33 out of 100 based on 25 reviews, indicating "generally unfavorable" reviews. Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B−" on an A+ to F scale.