
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017)
Synopsis
When the child Arthur’s father is murdered, Vortigern, Arthur’s uncle, seizes the crown. Robbed of his birthright and with no idea who he truly is, Arthur comes up the hard way in the back alleys of the city. But once he pulls the sword from the stone, his life is turned upside down and he is forced to acknowledge his true legacy…whether he likes it or not.
What is the budget of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword?
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, released in 2017, is a visually stunning retelling of the classic Arthurian legend. Directed by Guy Ritchie, the film features a star-studded cast including Charlie Hunnam, Jude Law, and Astrid Bergès-Frisbey. With a hefty budget, the financial stakes were high, making the film's budget a significant aspect of its overall narrative.
What was the production budget?
The production budget for King Arthur: Legend of the Sword was a staggering $175,000,000. This figure places it among the higher echelons of fantasy films, comparable to other big-budget productions like Pirates of the Caribbean and The Hobbit series. Such a substantial investment reflects the ambitious scope of the film, aiming to deliver a grand cinematic experience.
Budget Allocation Breakdown
While specific budget allocation details are often closely guarded, major cost factors typically include:
- Special Effects: Given the film's fantasy elements, a significant portion of the budget likely went towards CGI and visual effects.
- Locations: Filming in various locations, including the UK and Ireland, incurs substantial costs.
- Talent: The salaries of the high-profile cast and crew contribute significantly to the overall budget.
What were the major production costs?
Several elements contributed to the high production costs of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword. Notable expenses included:
- Special Effects: The film's action sequences and fantastical elements required advanced CGI, which can be quite costly.
- Set Design and Locations: Creating the medieval world of Camelot involved extensive set design and location scouting, adding to the overall expenses.
- Talent Salaries: The film's leading actors, including Charlie Hunnam and Jude Law, commanded significant salaries, further inflating the budget.
Despite the initial budget of $175 million, reports suggest that the final costs may have exceeded this figure due to various production challenges and overruns.
How did King Arthur: Legend of the Sword perform at the box office?
The worldwide box office earnings for King Arthur: Legend of the Sword totaled $139,630,336. Breaking this down further, the domestic box office brought in $39,175,066, while international markets contributed the majority of the earnings.
Break-even Point Analysis
To determine the film's financial success, it’s essential to consider the break-even point. Typically, a film needs to earn approximately double its production budget to cover marketing and distribution costs. In this case, King Arthur would have needed to gross around $350 million to break even, making its performance a disappointment.
ROI Percentage
With a total box office of $139,630,336 against a budget of $175,000,000, the return on investment (ROI) for King Arthur: Legend of the Sword is negative, indicating a loss for the studio.
Was King Arthur: Legend of the Sword profitable?
Given the box office performance, King Arthur: Legend of the Sword was not profitable. The film's financial struggles had implications for Warner Bros. and the future of the franchise. The disappointing earnings may have led to a reevaluation of budget allocations for similar projects in the genre.
Impact on Future Movie Budgets
The lackluster performance of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword could influence how studios approach big-budget fantasy films moving forward. A more cautious approach to spending may be adopted, especially for projects with similar themes.
Commonly Asked Questions
How much did King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) cost to make?
The production cost of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword was $175,000,000.
Was King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) profitable?
No, the film was not profitable, as it grossed $139,630,336 against its $175 million budget.
What was the most expensive element of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017)?
The most expensive elements likely included special effects and the salaries of the high-profile cast.
How much did King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) make at the box office?
The film made $139,630,336 at the worldwide box office.
Did King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) go over budget?
Yes, the final costs may have exceeded the initial budget of $175 million due to production challenges.
In summary, King Arthur: Legend of the Sword faced significant financial hurdles, with a production budget of $175 million and disappointing box office returns. The film's performance serves as a cautionary tale for future big-budget fantasy projects, highlighting the importance of balancing ambition with financial viability.









































































































































































































































































































Budget Templates
Build your own production budget
Create professional budgets with industry-standard feature film templates. Real-time collaboration, no spreadsheets.
Start Budgeting Free
.png&w=1200&q=75)